Skip to content
What Landed

The Spread Is the Fee

The stated fee is the small number, and the margin inside the exchange rate is usually the large one.

Left the sending bank2,982.00
Taken in transitnot stated
Converted
Reached your bank2,856.60

Still yours, and statedTaken, never statedUnit changes; scale restarts

Four steps from instruction to arrival. One step carries no figure: the hatching marks where the money leaves and is not drawn to scale, because there is no figure to draw. Nothing here adds them up, since an amount you cannot see is not an amount you can subtract. The unit changes part-way down: the figures below the break are in another currency, the bars below it are drawn against the published rate, and the first figure and the last are not the same kind of number. The section where the figures stop and the estimates start.

Home / The middle

The middle · Reference

Where the cost of one transfer actually sat, once the stated fee and the margin were separated

The fee printed on the payer's confirmation

The payer

Lands as: A flat charge, visible, itemised, and the smallest of the three costs in the transfer

Ask for instead: Nothing; this one is already disclosed and already somebody else's

The fee printed on your own statement

You

Lands as: A flat charge on arrival, visible, and the only deduction your own bank will explain

Ask for instead: Charges to the sender, which moves this line onto the payer

The margin inside the exchange rate

You

Lands as: Several times the two stated fees combined, taken as a worse rate rather than as a charge, and itemised nowhere

Ask for instead: A quote against the published mid-market rate, which forces the margin into the open

A deduction taken by a bank in the middle

You

Lands as: A figure that appears on no document at either end and is attributed to nobody

Ask for instead: A route with no correspondent, or charges instructed to the sender for the whole chain

The conversion done by your own bank on arrival, uninstructed

You

Lands as: A rate you did not shop for, applied automatically, with no competing quote and no notice

Ask for instead: An account that holds the incoming currency, so you choose when to convert

A service that advertises zero fees

You

Lands as: The whole cost is inside the rate, so a nil fee line is accurate and uninformative

Ask for instead: The landed amount for a stated sent amount, which is the only comparable quote

Six costs, and the two that are printed anywhere are the two smallest. One person's own transfer, taken apart afterwards; what any route charges, and how it is presented, differ by provider, by corridor and by amount.

The stated fee is the small number. The margin inside the exchange rate is usually several times larger, and it is not called a fee by anybody.

The practical point in “The Spread Is the Fee” is that a landed payment should be supported by a record somebody can explain. Used for gdpr employee monitoring, inspect the linked workflow can add transparent time and project context when collection is proportionate, people can correct mistakes and financial records remain separate.

That is the single most useful fact in this collection, and it explains why comparing transfer services on their fee tables tells you almost nothing.

The questions in “The Spread Is the Fee” can also be checked against XE currency resources. Use the outside resource to identify what evidence to request rather than assuming one provider sees the whole payment chain.

How the margin works

A bank or service converts at a rate slightly worse for you than the rate at which currency is actually trading. The difference is theirs.

No deduction appears anywhere. The money simply becomes a smaller number of the other currency than it would have at the market rate.

That is why it survives scrutiny so well. A customer looking for a charge finds none, concludes there was none, and is correct about the thing they were looking for.

Why it is invisible

A fee is a line. A margin is an absence: the rate you got was not the rate that existed, and nothing on any document shows you the rate that existed.

Unless you look up the market rate yourself for that day, there is nothing to compare against and nothing looks wrong.

The size of it

On retail bank transfers, commonly between two and four per cent, and on some corridors considerably more. On specialist services, often well under one.

A flat fee of ten or twenty units, next to a margin of three per cent on three thousand, is not the main event:

Cost Typical size on 3,000 Disclosed
Sending fee 15–25 Yes, to the payer
Receiving fee 5–15 Yes, to you
Conversion margin 30–120 No

Why zero-fee offers exist

A service advertising no fees is telling the truth: the fee line is nil and the cost is inside the rate.

That is not deception in itself. It becomes misleading only when the rate is not shown alongside a reference, which is why the comparison that matters is the landed amount.

The only honest comparison

Sent amount against landed amount. One figure, derived from two numbers you both have, including every fee and the margin.

Everything else — fee tables, rate claims, percentage promises — is a component. The all-in figure is the whole.

Working out what you paid

Divide landed by sent, then compare that rate with the published mid-market rate on the day. The gap is the total cost of the route.

Do it on three payments. One month can be odd; three with the same gap is a property of the arrangement.

Who the margin is taken by

Whoever performs the conversion, which may be the payer's bank, a correspondent, a payment service or your own bank on arrival.

Knowing which one did it changes who you talk to. The same percentage taken by your own bank is a conversation you can have; taken by a correspondent, it is not.

The conversion your own bank does

Where a payment arrives in a currency your account does not hold, your bank converts it automatically, at its own rate, with no competing quote.

That is frequently the single worst rate in the whole journey, because there is no point at which anybody shops for it.

What a good provider will tell you

The mid-market rate, their rate, and the difference, before you commit. Several do this as a matter of course.

A provider unwilling to show the reference rate alongside its own is telling you something about the size of the difference.

Why the margin varies by amount

Larger transfers frequently get better rates, sometimes by a lot, because the margin is a percentage and competition appears above a threshold.

Asking what rate applies above a stated amount is an ordinary question that costs nothing and is almost never asked.

Talking to the payer about it

Where the payer's provider converts, this is their choice and their relationship. A measured all-in figure gives them something to take to their own bank.

Several payers find they can get a better rate simply by asking, having never had a reason to.

Business banking rates are negotiable in a way retail ones are not, and a payer sending regular transfers has a volume argument they have probably never used.

What the margin cannot be negotiated to

Zero. Somebody holds inventory in two currencies and carries risk between them, and that has a real cost. A rate exactly at the mid-market point is not something anybody offers.

What is available is a difference measured in fractions of a per cent rather than in whole ones, and the whole of this subject is about knowing which of those two you are getting. That requires measuring rather than asking, because the answer to asking is always that the rate is competitive.